Reply to van Hoesel et al.: Impact-related Younger Dryas boundary nanodiamonds from The Netherlands.
نویسندگان
چکیده
Van Hoesel et al. (1) refer to nanodiamonds at the top of the Usselo horizon at Aalsterhut, The Netherlands, having an average age of 10.845 ± 0.015 C ka (12.70 ± 0.06 cal ka) (1); they found no nanodiamonds outside hat layer. Earlier, nanodiamonds were reported at the top of theUsselo in Lommel, Belgium,∼30 km southwest of Aalsterhut, acknowledged as the Younger Dryas boundary layer (YDB) [Tian et al. (2)]; those researchers also found no nanodiamonds outside that layer. Van Hoesel et al. (1) claim that the nanodiamond-rich layer atAalsterhut postdates the YDB by 200 y. However, that claim is indefensible. Based on eight radiocarbon dates from Murray Springs, averaging 10.89± 0.05 C ka and dates from the Greenland Ice Sheet Project 2 (GISP2) ice core (3), the calibrated YDB age is defined as 12.8 ± 0.15 cal ka [IntCal09 (4)], which overlaps the 12.70 ± 0.060 cal ka age of vanHoesel et al. (1).Nanodiamond-rich layers occur above Clovis-age archaeological materials at multiple North American sites, and this stratigraphic boundary is well-dated to the same time (refs. 3–5 and references therein). The radiocarbon dates from Arlington Canyon were never used to date the YDB because they are systematically older, likely resulting from the burning of large trees [old wood effect (5)]. The calibrated radiocarbon ranges from Aalsterhut and Murray Springs are virtually indistinguishable (Fig. 1). The age estimate for each is shown as probability distributions, defining the beginning and end of deposition (modeled as boundaries in OxCal 4.2). The Aalsterhut distribution comes from 14 dates (1), and Murray Springs is derived from eight radiocarbon dates (refs. 3–5 and references therein). The age distributions for these two sites are comparable and fall within the estimated YDB age range. Therefore, all dates for the nanodiamond-rich layers found at those two key sites are consistent with the age of the cataclysmic YDB impact event, now clearly defined at the beginning of the Younger Dryas cooling episode in the Greenland ice sheet (6).
منابع مشابه
Cosmic impact or natural fires at the Allerod-Younger Dryas boundary: a matter of dating and calibration.
Wittke et al. (1) present evidence of a major cosmic impact at the onset of the Younger Dryas (YD) episode, including some markers found in the top of the well-known Usselo marker horizon (UH). This finding is contrary to our extensive radiocarbon dating effort from this horizon (2), which shows that the UH at Aalsterhut postdates the onset of the YD. Furthermore, Wittke et al. (1) misinterpret...
متن کاملQuantifying the distribution of nanodiamonds in pre-Younger Dryas to recent age deposits along Bull Creek, Oklahoma panhandle, USA.
High levels of nanodiamonds (nds) have been used to support the transformative hypothesis that an extraterrestrial (ET) event (comet explosion) triggered Younger Dryas changes in temperature, flora and fauna assemblages, and human adaptations [Firestone RB, et al. (2007) Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 104(41):16016-16021]. We evaluate this hypothesis by establishing the distribution of nds within the B...
متن کاملIndependent evaluation of conflicting microspherule results from different investigations of the Younger Dryas impact hypothesis.
Firestone et al. sampled sedimentary sequences at many sites across North America, Europe, and Asia [Firestone RB, et al. (2007) Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 106:16016-16021]. In sediments dated to the Younger Dryas onset or Boundary (YDB) approximately 12,900 calendar years ago, Firestone et al. reported discovery of markers, including nanodiamonds, aciniform soot, high-temperature melt-glass, and m...
متن کاملEvidence from central Mexico supporting the Younger Dryas extraterrestrial impact hypothesis.
We report the discovery in Lake Cuitzeo in central Mexico of a black, carbon-rich, lacustrine layer, containing nanodiamonds, microspherules, and other unusual materials that date to the early Younger Dryas and are interpreted to result from an extraterrestrial impact. These proxies were found in a 27-m-long core as part of an interdisciplinary effort to extract a paleoclimate record back throu...
متن کاملReply to Holliday and Boslough et al.: Synchroneity of widespread Bayesian-modeled ages supports Younger Dryas impact hypothesis.
Holliday (1) rejects age-depth models for the Younger Dryas boundary layer (YDB) in Kennett et al. (2), claiming that they are incorrect for several reasons, including age reversals, high age uncertainties, and use of optically stimulated luminescence (OSL) dating. These same claims previously were presented in Meltzer et al. (3) and were discussed and refuted in Kennett et al. (2). These criti...
متن کاملذخیره در منابع من
با ذخیره ی این منبع در منابع من، دسترسی به آن را برای استفاده های بعدی آسان تر کنید
برای دانلود متن کامل این مقاله و بیش از 32 میلیون مقاله دیگر ابتدا ثبت نام کنید
ثبت ناماگر عضو سایت هستید لطفا وارد حساب کاربری خود شوید
ورودعنوان ژورنال:
- Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America
دوره 110 41 شماره
صفحات -
تاریخ انتشار 2013